ABSTRACT
Background and Aims: We evaluated whether stroke severity, functional outcome and mortality are different in patients with ischemic stroke with or without COVID-19 infection. Methods: A prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study in Catalonia, Spain. Recruitment was consecutive from mid-March to mid-May 2020. Patients had had an acute ischemic stroke within 48 hours and a previous modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0 to 3. We collected demographic data, vascular risk factors, prior mRS score, NIHSS score, rate of reperfusion therapies, logistics and metrics. Primary end-point was functional outcome at 3 months. Favourable outcome was defined depending on the previous mRS score. Secondary outcome was mortality at 3 months. We performed mRS shift and multivariate analyses. Results: We evaluated 701 patients (mean age 72.3±13.3 years, 60.5% men), and 91 (13%) had COVID-19 infection. Median baseline NIHSS score was higher in COVID-19 patients compared to patients without COVID-19 [8 (3-18) vs 6 (2-14), p=0.049)]. Proportion of patients with a favourable functional outcome was 33.7% in the COVID-19 and 47% in the non-COVID-19 group. However, after a multivariate logistic regression analysis, COVID-19 infection did not increase the probability of unfavourable functional outcome. Mortality rate was 39.3% among COVID-19 patients and 16.1% in the non-COVID-19 group. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, COVID-19 infection was a risk factor for mortality (HR 3.14 (95% CI, 2.10-4.71;p<0.001). Conclusions: Patients with ischemic stroke and COVID-19 infection have more severe strokes and higher mortality than stroke patients without COVID-19 infection. However, functional outcome is comparable in both groups.
ABSTRACT
Background and Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic has had enormous implications for stroke care. We aim to analyze its impact in stroke outcomes and mortality in two comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) from the Catalonian network. Methods:We studied all stroke patients admitted during 2020 and compared them with the admissions of 2019. Clinical and functional outcomes (mRS at discharge, in-hospital complications and mortality) were analyzed. Related factors, including SARS-CoV-2 infection, were determined. Results: A total of 2674 stroke patients were admitted in 2020, and 2652 during 2019. A higher number of unknown-onset strokes (45% vs 40%, p<0.01), ASPECTS<7 (8.3% vs 5.7%, p=0.03) and longer time from symptoms-onset to hospital-admission (median: 337 vs. 272min, p<0.01) were detected during 2020. Conversely, no significant differences appeared in stroke code activation (61.5% vs 62.5%), stroke subtype (ICH 9.1% vs 8.9%), severity (median NIHSS: 4 vs 5), pre-morbid mRS (mRS<3 81.8% vs 80.2%) or other relevant clinical characteristics nor reperfusion treatments (23.8% vs 23.9%). In-hospital complications and discharge-mRS were similar. However, we observed higher inhospital mortality in 2020 (9.6 vs 6.6%, p<0.001). An adjusted regression model pointed pre-morbid mRS, baseline NIHSS, ASPECTS and inhospital complications (OR 1.26, 1.14, 0.87 and 1.38 respectively, p<0.01) as independent predictors of mortality. SARS-CoV-2 infection (3.7% of strokes in 2020) was not predictor of mortality;in fact, these patients showed similar outcomes than the remaining 2020 strokes. Conclusions: The increased in-hospital mortality detected in 2020 in our series may be due to pandemic-related delays in stroke detection and hospital arrival rather than the direct effect of COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Severe infection by SARS-CoV-2 has shown to entail an increased risk of thrombotic, especially venous, events. Central venous catheters have also been associated with an increased risk of thrombotic complications. Paradoxical embolism as an aetiological mechanism of ischaemic stroke should be considered in a highly prothrombotic context, where it may be more frequent. CASE REPORT: A 40-year-old woman with a central venous catheter, with a large vessel ischaemic stroke, treated with mechanical thrombectomy for an atypical paradoxical embolism while in intensive care for bilateral COVID-19 pneumonia. In the aetiological study, analysis highlighted an elevation of the D-dimer and right-left shunt with massive passage of contrast directly from the central peripheral access pathway in the left upper extremity to the left atrium in the transoesophageal echocardiogram. Thoracic tomographic angiography showed an anomalous venous structure with its origin in the subclavian vein and drainage to the segmental vein of the left upper lobe with direct emptying into the left atrium. Treatment consisted in anticoagulation until removal of the central venous catheter and simple anti-aggregating medication on discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Paradoxical embolism due to intra- or extra-cardiac shunt should be considered in patients with COVID-19, given the high associated risk of venous thromboembolism. Further studies are needed to be able to define optimal prophylactic and therapeutic management.
TITLE: Complicación trombótica de neumonía grave por COVID-19: ictus por embolismo paradójico atípico.Introducción. La infección grave por el SARS-CoV-2 ha demostrado un incremento del riesgo de fenómenos trombóticos, especialmente venosos. Los catéteres venosos centrales también se han asociado a un mayor riesgo de complicaciones trombóticas. El embolismo paradójico como mecanismo etiológico del ictus isquémico debe tenerse en cuenta en un contexto protrombótico elevado, en el que puede ser más frecuente. Caso clínico. Mujer de 40 años, portadora de un catéter venoso central, con ictus isquémico de gran vaso, tratada con trombectomía mecánica por embolismo paradójico atípico durante el ingreso en cuidados intensivos por neumonía bilateral por COVID-19. Dentro del estudio etiológico, destacaba analíticamente una elevación del dímero D y shunt derecha-izquierda con paso masivo de contraste directamente desde la vía central de acceso periférico en la extremidad superior izquierda a la aurícula izquierda en el ecocardiograma transesofágico. Una angiotomografía torácica mostró una estructura venosa anómala con origen en la vena subclavia y drenaje a la vena segmentaria del lóbulo superior izquierdo con vaciado directo a la aurícula izquierda. Se decidió anticoagulación hasta la retirada del catéter venoso central y antiagregación simple al alta. Conclusiones. El embolismo paradójico por shunt intra o extracardíaco debe considerarse en pacientes con COVID-19, dado el elevado riesgo tromboembólico venoso asociado. Para definir el manejo profiláctico y terapéutico óptimo son necesarios más estudios.